Wednesday, December 15, 2010

New Word Created by The Occasional Pundit


Yours Truly has invented a new word. It is algoraphobia, a noun that means: the fear of being lectured to death for not driving an electric car.

Soros the Puppet Master - Installment One

Soros advises Obama to use forceful measures to override the will of the people

By Ed Lasky for American Thinker

George Soros funds the Center for American Progress, which has been characterized as Barack Obama’s Ideas Factory. John Podesta, its head, led the transition team when Barack Obama became President. The Center has also become a hiring hall for the Obama team, filling its positions with former employees (among these was controversial Van Jones — who now is back at the Center).

Apparently, George Soros and his Center are upset that the American people placed a roadblock in their plans when we rose up and painted the nation red. The Center now is providing a blueprint of ways Barack Obama can do an end run around the people’s will by resorting to methods that will strike many of us as being improper-to say the least. Relying on executive orders, interpretation of regulations, rule -making and the like they are collectively a recipe for even more power being assumed by President Obama.

From Tuesday’s Politico Playbook:

[The] Center for American Progress today is releasing a report, “Power of the President,” proposing 30 executive actions the president can take to advance progressive change in the areas of energy, the economy, health care, education, foreign policy, and national security. “The following authorities can be used to ensure progress on key issues facing the country today: Executive orders, Rulemaking, Agency management, Convening and creating public-private partnerships , Commanding the armed forces, Diplomacy.

The New York Times fleshes out these proposals with some suggestions about policy changes across the board. The ideology of George Soros shines through the Center’s report as it justifies this forceful approach to circumvent Congress when it states that:

[The] legislative battles that Mr. Obama waged during his first two years – notably on health care and financial regulatory reform – have created a weariness among the general public with the process of making laws. And it hints it has not helped Mr. Obama politically in the process.

In other words, when Congress passed a variety of laws Americans became dismayed by the horse-trading and bribes that were resorted to by Democrats to impose these policies on us. Instead of compromise and listening to the American people, Soros counsels that more forceful measures should be used to override the will of the American people.

And this is the man the Democratic Party has as their sugar daddy and who various Democratic leaders over the years have defended and praised (for example, as shown by this letter from 11 Democratic lawmakers).

He is certainly a dictatorial daddy.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Skanky Fat Terrorist

Here a typical member of the Religion of Peace reveals what all Muslims believe about Jews. This is a future Muslim baby factory - fat, educated, producing little Jihadis for the coming takeover of America. She convicts her filthy terrorist brethren and herself with her own mouth and the world does nothing. She can say whatever she wishes in America. In the land of her "prophet" she would be cook or a cleaning woman, too fat and ugly for a wife.

Friday, May 7, 2010

America's Finest Protect us From Marijuana

Why do police need SWAT teams to bust some joker for smoking a joint? For that matter who really cares if some joker is smoking a joint? Why did they have to pump six bullets into the family dog right in front of a seven year-old kid? Welcome to the new America where "things like that just don't happen."



Credit for this post goes to Radley Balko.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

My Health Is Cared For

The “healthcare bill” that was recently passed in spite of bi-partisan opposition only gives the federal government more control over our lives. It will not reduce costs. It will not improve care. It will however ensure that there is an equal distribution of misery among us, the people. I don’t like it. I want to be able to decide with my doctor how to address my health issues - not have the government do it for me through some faceless bureaucrat in a cubicle somewhere in Washington D.C. Who in their right mind wants to have the most intimately personal choices in their life dictated by someone whose chief interests are payday and quitting time? Yes, I know that’s not what the President said when he was smearing lipstick on this pig and bribing his own party with our money in order to pass it. What government has done to American healthcare over the last 50 years is like the busy-body neighbor who comes over uninvited to help paint your house and somehow manages to burn it to the ground. We’ll soon be like our neighbors to the north where you have to wait 18 months for a hip replacement but you can get a sex change operation the next day. Perhaps we’ll be reduced to scraping up bribes to get doctors to do what we need instead of what the feds will allow. If in need of a new hip, we can sign up for a sex change and just say,”well, since you’re switching around things in the general area and I’m under anesthesia anyway, here’s an extra five or ten large for you and the operating room team. Please fix my hip so I’ll be able to walk around and show off my new private pieces.”

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Amerika, Amerika - Obama Shed his Tyranny on Thee




I sure could use some cheering up right now. I'd go through a colonoscopy every week if the the Congress and the Whitehouse could be stopped.

Everyone who's on the side of this attack on liberty is either a big business that's already been made safe, a nonproductive citizen, or a citizen who works in government or some other entity that depends on federal government money to survive.

The pattern is always the same with America's compassionate overlords. They join forces with the media giants and demonize an industry, pharmaceuticals for instance. They can't open their mouths without putting down that industry. All the time it's a nudge and a wink behind closed doors with the industry they demonize. When they've dispensed a sufficient amount of kool-aid to the Time/NPR/NBC crowd, they intoduce legislation to "fix" it and punish those horrible profit making bastards who live off the backs of the "working poor." What do we end up with? More government beauracracy, higher taxes, higher prices, and the drug companies' stock prices going through the roof. I wonder how many congressional Democrats bought drug stocks by the bucketfull on the Friday before the healthcare vote in the House.
Passed without a complaint is a law that puts the entire college loan business under the federal government. Washington will now decide who can borrow money for school and probably will start deciding which schools can be attended with their loan money. Control. Control. Control.

Well over half the people working in the American car making business are now effectively government employees. How many more industries will these people destroy with their regulations and union favoritism just to put them under federal control? It appears that there is no way to stop them short of violence but that's their way. We have to find another way to stop them. GM and Chrysler will never make a profit as long as the government is in charge. They will always be subsidized by the rest of the taxpayers and will become a solid socialist voting block for you know who and in perpetuity.

The people who actually produce the wealth are shrinking in number at an alarming rate. The American middle class, the most potent economic force in world history, is being systematically destroyed by a small gang of fascists. Close to half of our population are now part of the economic underclass. If they get immigrant amnesty passed, no Democrat will get less than 50% of the popular vote in a national election ever again. We are alarmingly close to having a one-party permanent majority in a pseudo-democratic dictatorship.

I believe that there now exists a very distinct possibility that the Democrats will find a way to repeal the 22nd amendment or suspend the constitution before their messiah is forced to leave the Whitehouse.

They have shown that they have no scruples whatsoever when it comes to torturing the legislative process to do whatever they please. If they are not somehow stopped with their next major move (legalizing illegals), the game is over. The Republic is dead.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

The Times It Ain't a-Changin'

Talk about hate speech. I just saw a New York Times column that once again labels Tea Party people as racists. The hateful little puke who wrote the column claims that "some" of the 60,000 protesters at the U.S. Capitol last Sunday called a black congressman a nigger and spat on him. Further, there was the claim that someone calleed Barney Frank a faggot. I think it's odd that with thousands of cameras and microphones there (every cell phone has one), not a single piece of video or audio has surfaced to confirm the accusation. That's just odd.

What's really hateful is a gang of left wing kool-aid drinking morons, i.e. the New York Times, spreading what is probably a lie to their legions of like-minded pablum suckers to further foment hatred against everyday people who went to Washington seeking redress of their grievances. The New York Times is a Bolshevik propaganda sheet and it's editorial staff are bigoted hate-mongers.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Blame it on Bush

Well here we are a year into the Blessed Reign of The One (blessings and peace be upon him) and it's all still Bush's fault. The day after Scott Brown won the "Kennedy Seat" in Massachusetts, The One (blessings and peace be upon him) did an interview with George Stephanopolous in which he made the most ridiculous Bush-faulting statement ever. The One (blessings and peace be upon him) claimed that the brainless left wing atomaton Martha (Marsha if you're a Kennedy) Coakley failed to win a senate seat in the most left-voting state in America because of "anger" over former President Bush.


What he claimed is that the same wave of voter anger that swept him into the oval office brought in Scott Brown as well.


What?


Anti-Bush anger was so intense that it caused the majority of special election voters in Massachusetts to vote for a candidate who largely supports Bush administration policy?


What?


Besides, wasn't it "hope and change" and "change we can believe in" that swept The One (blessings and peace be upon him) to power in the first place?


I have to wonder if The One (blessings and peace be upon him) switched to hallucinogens when he quit snorting coke.